FOR NOW ITS GUILLOTINE & ARENA TIME ONCE AGAIN!!!
COME ON AMERICA STAND UP FOR YOURSELVES &
BACK WHAT REP. KAPTUR IS TELLING YOU!!!
Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur, who represents Northern Ohio's Ninth Congressional District , is currently serving her thirteenth term in the U.S. House of Representatives. She is the senior-most woman in Congress and is one of only 90 women out of 535 members of the 110th Congress. Kaptur is also the author of a book, Women in Congress that was published by Congressional Quarterly.http://www.kaptur.house.gov/
THANK YOU REP. MARCY KAPTUR...
A TRUE INSPIRATIONAL LADY OF LIBERTY!!!
WE GREEN GLADIATORS SURELY SALUTE & HONOR YOU!
NOW THAT'S ONE GOOD MOMMA TELLING YOU ALL TO WAKE UP
& REALIZE THAT ENOUGH IS ENOUGH...TIME TO WHACK OFF
SOME HIGH PLACED PLUNDERING RICH THIEVES & LIARS EVIL HEADS!
WAKE UP AMERICA... & RIGHT ON_WAY TO GO REP. MARCY KAPTUR!!!
WE PASSIONSWORD ARENA GREEN GLADIATORS SALUTE YOU!!!
A DIVINE WAKE UP CALL INTO THE FUTURE FOR US
TO THUS RE-EXAMINE OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
EARTH-OUR PLANET, NATURE, EACH OTHER & WITHIN OURSELVES!
Tuesday, September 02, 2008
GOD BLESS AMERICA & LADY LIBERTY ~
SO THUS DEDICATED TO MY NONNA ARENA
& TO THE JOURNEY & THE DREAM ~
http://passionsword.blogspot.com/2008/09/god-bless-america-lady-liberty-so-thus.html
Thus...Notions of authority become unmeaningful in the world
of the perpetual signifier, wherein truth is determined by
the PLAY between various subjective meanings...So...
My primary audience is composed of Independent
Minded Blogger Collective Gathering Of Souls, who have
a much higher tolerance for Conspiracy Theory Analysis
than the other actual goon Brain-challenged-Brainwashed
Or Totally Brain-dead Ignorant Goon-Henchmen.
So Anyone not relying on this information for anything
except Horror-Show and Terror- A Go Go purposes is
advised to seek immediate assistance from certified
professionals with practice caring for the Brain washed
& *brain-challenged*.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Sangue Sacro ~ Respice Adspice Prospice ~
Thus Come & See" Within
The Magic Mirror Of Reflected Truth
At The Truth That Lies Within...
An Everlasting Gaze
Seen Reflected In The...
Mirror,Mirror On The Wall
Tell The Tale To One And All
Let It Be Known Far And Wide
That Truth Be Cast From Deep Inside
Then All Shall Come To Gaze And See
The Reflection Of Truth That None Can Flee
Forever Held In A Tale Of Tales
Within A Hope That Never Fails
And Thus The Dream Shall Come To Pass
In A StoryBook Tale That Reflects In Glass
~ GLADIATOR ZERO ~
SEE WITHIN their Infinite Deferral of Desire & Their
infinite sequences to be infinite deferral of justification.
TALK ABOUT IN THE RED & THEIR EVIL JUSTIFICATIONS
Hay cadenas infinitas de justificación
Ingresado el 30.V.2006 en la categoría: General >
Epistemología por Hilan Bensusan.
http://www.accionfilosofica.com/blog/mensaje.pl?id=94
Infinite sequences of justifications have been often dismissed as a somehow inadequate way to justify beliefs. That justification requires infinite sequences can be argued by an argument (A) around the following lines (from 1-3 to 4):
1. A belief is justified only if a justified belief is a reason for it.
2. There are justified beliefs.
3. The proper ancestral of the reason-relation is irreflexive.
4. There is an infinite sequence of justified beliefs each of which is a reason for its predecessor.
Attempts to resist 4 (and A) are motivated by taking 4 to be unacceptable. The argument can then be countered by some variety of foundationalism (rejecting 1), some variety of coherentism (rejecting 3) or some variety of skepticism (rejecting 2).
Recently, infinitism has been regarded with more sympathetic eyes (Black 1996, 2003, Klein 1999). The groudwork done has been to establish that the most frequent criticisms to the idea of a justifying infinite sequence are not compelling. (For example, that we cannot have an infinite number of justified beliefs or that our mind cannot hold infinite sequences.) This shows that the dismissal of infinte sequences of justifications has been too hasty. To complete the job of rendering 4 more plausible, one may think that an example of a reasonable infinite sequence of justification has to be given. Now, here is an example of what I take to be an acceptable (and in fact of the sort that is quite present in everyday life) infinite sequence of justifications:
S justifiedly believes that 'x is red' because
S justifiedly believes she knows what is red because
S justifiedly believes she knows what is a knower
of what is red because
S justifiedly believes she knows what is a knower
of a knower of what is red because
…
Or, put in other, perhaps more easily readable way:
S justifiedly believes that ‘x is red’ because
S is a good (or reliable) detector of red because
S is a good (or reliable) detector of good (or reliable) detectors of red because
S is a good (or reliable) detector of good (or reliable) detectors of good (or reliable) detectors of red because
…
Each belief in the sequence is justified by the next one and yet every belief has to be present if S is to justifiedly belief that 'x is red'. The justiifcation of one belief requires the justification of all the beliefs in the sequence. If this is an infinite sequence of justifications invoked to justify an observational report, it is reasonable to consider that we make use of infinite sequences of justifications all the time and that most cases of justification seem to invoke an infinite regress. Infinite sequences of justifications seem to be not only possible but abundant.
Infinite sequences of justfications like the one above bear resemblence to what is a commonplace about truth that, in its turn, is related to what Tarski called the material condition for adequacy in a theory of truth. It is generally accepted that
if x is red then
‘x is red’ is true then
‘ ‘x is red’ is true’ is true then
‘ ‘ ‘x is red’ is true’ is true’ is true then
…
Maintaining something (or that something is true) is often thought of as maintaining an infinite set of claims. The example of infinite sequence of justifications above can be visible from this commonplace about truth if we consider what we do when we establish that something is true. We can say that we do so by establishing the truth of an infinite sequence of claims:
S establishes that x is red by
establishing that ‘x is red’ is true and she does that by
establishing that ‘ ‘x is red’ is true’ is true and she does that by
establishing that ‘ ‘ ‘x is red’ is true’ is true’ is true and she does that by
…
My example of an infinite sequence of justification is readily presentable in a recursive manner. I believe this is a good candidate necessary condition for adequate infinite sequences. Klein (1999) considers the objection that there is an element of arbitrariness in infinitism as we can place any claim in an infinite chain of justifications. This can be countered by saying that not all infinite sequences of justifications are adequate justifiers of a claim: only some infinite sequences of justifications are adequate. The next step is to present necessary and sufficient conditions for a sequence to be adequate––which is, of course, an enormous and maybe impossible task that would possibly amount to solve all the epistemological questions at once. I cannot present those conditions but I conjecture that a good necessary condition for an infinite sequence to be adequate is that it is presentable in a recursive manner.
Recursively expressible infinite sequences of justifications can help us deal with the old objection to infinitism that takes infinite sequences to be infinite deferral of justification––justification is never presented, it is at best only promised. Presented in a recursive manner, the infinite sequence is all there and the justification is in front of is––infinte sequences of justification are understood as actual (Cantorian) infinute sequences. The justification is therefore provided by the sequence and nothing is left for an infinite deferral; if all the justification needed for the belief is in the infinite sequence, one needs no infinite time or infinite number of steps to attain it. Justification, then, is not provisional but rather complete. Recursive infinite sequences, however, can be more complex and can involve more interesting (or at least more surprising) justifications but they have the advantage of coming to view in a finite number of steps; namely the recursive clauses.
A Note on Internalism
It is reasonable to assume that we often infer using infinite sets of premises. Consider what is often said about the famous (Carrollian) infinite regress requirement for Modus Ponens:
Premise 1. If p then q
Premise 2. p
Premise 3. If 1 and 2 then q
Premise 4. If 1, 2 and 3 then q
etc.
Conclusion. q
We claim that a conclusion can be drawn from 1 and 2 only because we take the meaning of the words––the connectives––to be established somewhere else and not in the argument. The meaning of these words constitute what makes the rule of inference an effective constraint on what we think. This constraint is often thought as coming from an external source––external to the argument itself. This appeal to external sources for constraint is made unnecessary if we assume that Modus Ponens, for instance, involves an infinite set of premises.
The analogy I want to draw is that, in a similar way, an infinite sequence of justification provide all justification needed and could satisfy all the (epistemological) internalist cravings for reasons. There is nothing that is not available to the thinker in the process of justification––everything is there, open to her view and scrutinizable in the form of the recursive clauses. There is, therefore, no need to appeal to true reliable reporters, to truths about the world or to whatever could capture the (epistemological) externalist fancy. Infinitism can prove to be the ultimate resource for an internalist epistemology.
THE INFINITE DEFERRAL OF BI-VALENT LOGIC
http://www.thewordproject.com/LOGIC.htm
So Our World Of Today In The Here & Now Has Become
A Spectropia: A Ghost Story on the Infinite Deferral
Of Divine Desire Played Out In Past Retrospections
& Future Introspections Of Todays Here & Now Decisions
Thus It's Time To Pick Up The Pace For...
We Have Now Once Again Crossed Over A
Destined New Millennial Threshold Barrier,
AS THE GRAND PARADIGM SHIFT RETURN INTO THE
NEW MATRIARCHAL MILLENNIUM HAS NOW OCCURRED.
WHILE A NEW POWER MATRIX -VORTEX TRANSFORMATION
IS ALSO UNDERWAY AND THUS THE SHIFT IS HAPPENING
BY LEAVING & GOING BACK OUT FROM THE NORTH & WEST
AND SO RETURNING BACK TOWARDS THE SOUTH & EAST...
THUS THE INEVITABLE MARCH OF TIME & SPACE WITHIN
THE ESSENTIAL EXISTENTIALISM OF THE MOTHER_WOMB
BEGINS AGAIN...SO TELL ME ALL YOUR THOUGHTS ON GOD
CAUSE I'D REALLY LIKE TO MEET HER...& ASK HER WHY
WERE WHO WE ARE...TELL ME ALL YOUR THOUGHTS ON GOD
CAUSE I'M ON MY WAY TO SEE HER...SO TELL ME AM I VERY FAR
AM I VERY FAR NOW...AM I VERY FAR NOW????
SO THUS>>>
It is precisely through the infinite deferral of authority
to an irrecoverable past that authority itself is constituted
So May The Force Of Truth & Freedom Be With You Always
For So Thus As Always So Be Thus So Be Eternally...
Signed Gladly, Sadly & Tragically
At The Silent PassionSword Blades Edge
We Bitter Over Bitter Sweet Gladiators
Of The Society Of The Sacred PassionsWord
@The Centrist Arena of Gladiators 1981-2008, are # Of
The Society Of The Sacred Sword, a wholly-owned subsidiary
Of $ Grand Journey Enterprise Release LTD, a privately-held
Investigative Research Source of Internet Conspiracy Theory%
THUS ONCE AGAIN TELL ME ALL YOUR THOUGHTS ON GOD
CAUSE I'D REALLY LIKE TO MEET HER...& ASK HER WHY
WERE WHO WE ARE...AS WE ALL NOW SLOWLY FADE TO BLACK
